Selection Process & Criteria
A transparent, internationally recognized framework for evaluating all applicants, exhibitors, artworks, scientific projects, and innovations.
Recommended Jury Process
Digital Review
Applications, portfolios, and proposals reviewed online by the selection committee.
Technical Screening
Safety, feasibility, and logistics check to ensure projects are practical and exhibition-ready.
Final Jury Review
Scoring and deliberation using the official Intellaris evaluation framework.
Awards Selection
Top projects shortlisted and award winners chosen by the jury panel.
Selection Criteria
Eight core dimensions used to assess every submission
Innovation & Originality
- ✦ Demonstrates new thinking, creativity, or breakthrough concepts
- ✦ Presents unique solutions, methods, or artistic expression
- ✦ Offers fresh perspectives beyond conventional approaches
Relevance to Theme
- ✦ Aligns with the mission of science, art, and innovation
- ✦ Shows meaningful integration of disciplines where applicable
- ✦ Contributes to future-focused ideas and global progress
Quality & Excellence
- ✦ High professional, technical, or artistic standards
- ✦ Strong execution, presentation, and attention to detail
- ✦ Clear evidence of expertise and craftsmanship
Impact & Value
- ✦ Potential social, educational, environmental, cultural, or economic impact
- ✦ Ability to inspire audiences or solve real-world challenges
- ✦ Encourages awareness, dialogue, or positive change
Feasibility & Readiness
- ✦ Project is practical, functional, and ready for exhibition display
- ✦ Safe, stable, and manageable within exhibition requirements
- ✦ Meets deadlines, installation needs, and technical specifications
Audience Engagement
- ✦ Interactive, visually compelling, or thought-provoking experience
- ✦ Accessible and understandable for diverse visitors
- ✦ Encourages participation or curiosity
Sustainability & Ethics
- ✦ Responsible use of materials and resources
- ✦ Ethical standards respected in research, design, and content
- ✦ Supports inclusive and sustainable values
International Merit
- ✦ Suitable for a global audience
- ✦ Represents cultural diversity or universal relevance
- ✦ Potential to attract international interest and collaboration
Official Jury Evaluation Scorecard
Creative Excellence
20 Marks- • Original concept
- • Strong vision and identity
- • Distinctive creative value
- • Exceptional artistic or design quality
Scientific / Technical Merit
20 Marks- • Research quality
- • Accuracy and credibility
- • Technical advancement
- • Functional innovation
Relevance to Intellaris Theme
15 Marks- • Connection to science, art, and innovation
- • Cross-disciplinary strength
- • Future-oriented ideas
Impact Potential
20 Marks- • Social benefit
- • Educational value
- • Economic or industry relevance
- • Cultural significance
Presentation & Visitor Experience
10 Marks- • Display quality
- • Visitor engagement
- • Interactivity
- • Clear communication
Sustainability & Ethics
10 Marks- • Eco-conscious methods
- • Ethical standards
- • Inclusivity and accessibility
Global Significance
5 Marks- • International appeal
- • Scalability or replication potential
- • Cross-cultural relevance
Total Score: 100 Marks
Special Awards
Grand Prix Intellaris
Best Innovation Award
Best Science Discovery Award
Best International Artist Award
Sustainability Excellence Award
Young Visionary Award
Public Choice Award
Future Impact Award
Jury Composition
The jury may include:
- • Scientists and researchers
- • Artists and curators
- • Innovation and technology experts
- • Industry leaders
- • Academic professionals
- • International cultural representatives
Jury Ethics Rules
- • Independent and unbiased judging
- • Conflict of interest disclosure required
- • Equal treatment for all nations and participants
- • Confidential scoring process
- • Final jury decision is binding
Jury Decision Levels
- 90–100: Outstanding / Premium Selection
- 80–89: Selected
- 70–79: Selected with Improvements
- 60–69: Waitlisted
- Below 60: Not Selected