July 26, 2025
Intellaris

Selection Process & Criteria

A transparent, internationally recognized framework for evaluating all applicants, exhibitors, artworks, scientific projects, and innovations.

Recommended Jury Process

Stage 1

Digital Review

Applications, portfolios, and proposals reviewed online by the selection committee.

Stage 2

Technical Screening

Safety, feasibility, and logistics check to ensure projects are practical and exhibition-ready.

Stage 3

Final Jury Review

Scoring and deliberation using the official Intellaris evaluation framework.

Stage 4

Awards Selection

Top projects shortlisted and award winners chosen by the jury panel.

Selection Criteria

Eight core dimensions used to assess every submission

01

Innovation & Originality

  • Demonstrates new thinking, creativity, or breakthrough concepts
  • Presents unique solutions, methods, or artistic expression
  • Offers fresh perspectives beyond conventional approaches
02

Relevance to Theme

  • Aligns with the mission of science, art, and innovation
  • Shows meaningful integration of disciplines where applicable
  • Contributes to future-focused ideas and global progress
03

Quality & Excellence

  • High professional, technical, or artistic standards
  • Strong execution, presentation, and attention to detail
  • Clear evidence of expertise and craftsmanship
04

Impact & Value

  • Potential social, educational, environmental, cultural, or economic impact
  • Ability to inspire audiences or solve real-world challenges
  • Encourages awareness, dialogue, or positive change
05

Feasibility & Readiness

  • Project is practical, functional, and ready for exhibition display
  • Safe, stable, and manageable within exhibition requirements
  • Meets deadlines, installation needs, and technical specifications
06

Audience Engagement

  • Interactive, visually compelling, or thought-provoking experience
  • Accessible and understandable for diverse visitors
  • Encourages participation or curiosity
07

Sustainability & Ethics

  • Responsible use of materials and resources
  • Ethical standards respected in research, design, and content
  • Supports inclusive and sustainable values
08

International Merit

  • Suitable for a global audience
  • Represents cultural diversity or universal relevance
  • Potential to attract international interest and collaboration

Official Jury Evaluation Scorecard

Creative Excellence

20 Marks
  • • Original concept
  • • Strong vision and identity
  • • Distinctive creative value
  • • Exceptional artistic or design quality

Scientific / Technical Merit

20 Marks
  • • Research quality
  • • Accuracy and credibility
  • • Technical advancement
  • • Functional innovation

Relevance to Intellaris Theme

15 Marks
  • • Connection to science, art, and innovation
  • • Cross-disciplinary strength
  • • Future-oriented ideas

Impact Potential

20 Marks
  • • Social benefit
  • • Educational value
  • • Economic or industry relevance
  • • Cultural significance

Presentation & Visitor Experience

10 Marks
  • • Display quality
  • • Visitor engagement
  • • Interactivity
  • • Clear communication

Sustainability & Ethics

10 Marks
  • • Eco-conscious methods
  • • Ethical standards
  • • Inclusivity and accessibility

Global Significance

5 Marks
  • • International appeal
  • • Scalability or replication potential
  • • Cross-cultural relevance

Total Score: 100 Marks

Special Awards

Grand Prix Intellaris

Best Innovation Award

Best Science Discovery Award

Best International Artist Award

Sustainability Excellence Award

Young Visionary Award

Public Choice Award

Future Impact Award

Jury Composition

The jury may include:

  • • Scientists and researchers
  • • Artists and curators
  • • Innovation and technology experts
  • • Industry leaders
  • • Academic professionals
  • • International cultural representatives

Jury Ethics Rules

  • • Independent and unbiased judging
  • • Conflict of interest disclosure required
  • • Equal treatment for all nations and participants
  • • Confidential scoring process
  • • Final jury decision is binding

Jury Decision Levels

  • 90–100: Outstanding / Premium Selection
  • 80–89: Selected
  • 70–79: Selected with Improvements
  • 60–69: Waitlisted
  • Below 60: Not Selected